So, you want to do science, uh? (Rants to Young Scientists Part I: Citations)

Sometimes, I wish someone had made that statement and followed with some advice, real world advice. I mean, Medawar's "Advice to a young scientist" was great in convincing me science was about inquiry, patience and common sense —the well-known adage of  1% inspiration and 99% perspiration— but, after a few years into the academia, I wished someone had told me about the dark side of research: citation engineering, steering and hiding just to mention some examples. I mean, all these lay inside the gray area between ethical and unethical behavior and a simple search brings up discussion forums on the topic in all the scientific communities from social to natural sciences.

I guess, right now, it is my frustration talking: I have seen a couple of recently published articles related to our late work that doesn't even bother to cite us even when we have introduced some basic concepts or techniques on the topic, our manuscript was published at a major journal and, also, a simple scholar search brings out our papers on the top of the list.

I'm curious about the motivation behind these practices. Discarding those cases when there's truly no knowledge about the previous work and results have been re-derived from the start — t happens, believe me—, I can imagine that some guys are so worried about fame and recognition, that they try to bring their work and only their work into the playground to increase the visibility of their papers above similar results from other groups. Some other guys may wish to engineer their metrics by increasing the citations to this or that paper, even in cases unrelated to the matter at hand, in order to fulfill requierements of evaluation agencies. Or maybe I'm completely wrong and don't understand the motivations behind us, human beings. 

So, you want to do science, right? Well, it's the best job you will have if you are into it. It's not as logical, ethical and "pure" as you would expect. Shit happens even in the ivory tower of academia but the good things is that the nice ethical guys are more than those in the gray side of the ethical/moral spectrum. The best part is: it depends on you to keep it that way. Cite, cite truthful, cite well. Sometimes your superior will have the last word —been there— just don't go down without raising the point, that will get you an explanation about how it is not unethical or amoral engineering or steering citations —it's up to you to buy it or not, I didn't—.